How Detailed Should Our Relationship Timeline Be?

A relationship timeline for a partner visa should be detailed enough to show each important stage of the relationship with approximate dates, from first meeting to the present, but short enough to read quickly. One or two pages listing key events, living arrangements, periods apart and visits usually works best, matched to the evidence lodged.
Not sure what to put in your relationship timeline? Tell us when you met, when you moved in together and any periods apart.

How detailed should our relationship timeline be?

A relationship timeline should be detailed enough that a case officer can understand the whole relationship in a few minutes. It should list the key events in date order, such as first meeting, first date, becoming exclusive, meeting each other's families, moving in together, engagement, marriage, periods apart and major trips. Each entry needs an approximate date and one line of description. Our guide to the partner visa evidence timeline shows a practical structure.

Is a relationship timeline required for a partner visa?

A relationship timeline is not a mandatory document for a partner visa, but it is widely used because it makes the evidence easier to follow. The main narrative of the relationship belongs in the one relationship statement, and a timeline sits alongside it as a summary. Our guide to the partner visa relationship statement explains what the statement itself should cover.

Should the timeline include exact dates?

The timeline should include exact dates where the couple knows them and approximate months where it does not. Guessing an exact date that later proves wrong is worse than saying "around March". Dates for living together, marriage and any separations need particular care, because they must match the forms, travel records and earlier visa applications. Our article on partner visa conflicting statements explains why consistency matters.

What dates matter most in a partner visa timeline?

The dates that matter most in a partner visa timeline are those the law relies on. For de facto couples, the 12 months before lodgement is central to the de facto requirement in regulation 2.03A, unless an exception applies. For married couples, the marriage date and the start of living together matter. Periods apart should be shown with the reason and how contact was kept. Our article on the de facto 12-month rule explains the 12-month calculation.

Should the timeline refer to the evidence?

The timeline should refer to the evidence where it helps, for example by noting that a trip is supported by booking records or that a lease began on a given date. Cross-references let a case officer move from the summary to the proof quickly. A timeline that refers to evidence that was never attached causes confusion. Our partner visa document checklist helps couples confirm that every document mentioned is included.

What mistakes do couples make with relationship timelines?

The common mistakes couples make with relationship timelines are including too much daily detail, leaving out separations or previous relationships, and giving dates that differ from those in the forms or earlier visa applications. Omitting an awkward period rarely helps, because the Department often has the records anyway. Our article on previous relationships explains how earlier partners are disclosed.

How does My Migration Lawyers prepare a relationship timeline?

My Migration Lawyers builds the timeline from the couple's own accounts and then tests each date against passports, travel history, leases, earlier visa applications and the forms before anything is lodged. The firm keeps the timeline to a short summary, links it to the evidence and makes sure it matches the relationship statement word for word on key dates. Couples can ask our partner visa lawyers to review their timeline.

MML
Speak To Our Lawyers

Get Clear Answers on Your Visa Options

Send us the details of your situation. One of our migration lawyers will review it and get back to you with clear advice on what you can do next and what it involves.
‍
Partner visas, protection visas, refusals and cancellations, ART review, judicial review, complex matters, corporate migration.

I came to this firm for help with my protection visa because I was very confused about the process. They listened to my situation carefully and explained what information and documents would be important. I feel much more comfortable having professional help with everything.

MML

Mariam K

Connect with our friendly team

1300 040 300
Or fill in the form & we'll call you
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
MML
About the Reviewer

Who Reviewed This Page

Weiwei Zhang is an Australian lawyer practising exclusively in Australian migration law and is the Principal Lawyer at My Migration Lawyers. She reviews the firm's published legal guidance for accuracy.
Weiwei Zhang, Principal Lawyer at My Migration Lawyers

Weiwei Zhang

Managing Director and Principal Lawyer, My Migration Lawyers
Weiwei Zhang, Principal Lawyer at My Migration Lawyers
Weiwei Zhang
Principal Lawyer
Weiwei Zhang is an Australian lawyer practising exclusively in Australian migration law and is the Principal Lawyer at My Migration Lawyers. She reviews the firm's published legal guidance for accuracy.
Last Reviewed
October 8, 2026
Question not answered here? Ask our lawyers directly.