Can We Use Evidence From Before We Lived Together?

Evidence from before a couple lived together can be used for a partner visa. It shows how the relationship began and developed, and it may also prove the de facto relationship existed before moving in. The Department assesses the whole relationship history, although the strongest weight usually falls on evidence from the more recent period.
Have evidence from the early part of your relationship? Tell us when you met, when you became a couple and when you moved in together.

Key points

  • The Department considers all the circumstances of the relationship, including its history (regulations 1.09A and 1.15A).
  • A de facto couple must live together or not live separately and apart on a permanent basis (section 5CB of the Migration Act), so a de facto relationship can exist before moving in.
  • De facto partners must generally show the relationship existed for 12 months immediately before lodgement (regulation 2.03A).

Does evidence from before we lived together count for a partner visa?

Evidence from before a couple lived together counts for a partner visa because the Department assesses the relationship as a whole, not only the period under one roof. Messages, call logs, visits, travel together and introductions to family all show how the relationship developed and how the couple became committed to each other. This early material gives context to later evidence and makes the relationship story believable. Our article on the partner visa evidence timeline explains how far back to go.

Can evidence from before moving in help meet the 12-month de facto requirement?

Evidence from before moving in can help meet the 12-month de facto requirement where the couple was already in a de facto relationship before sharing a home. Section 5CB does not require a de facto couple to live together, as long as they do not live apart on a permanent basis and are committed to a shared life. Couples who lived in different cities or countries before moving in sometimes show a de facto relationship from an earlier date. Our article on the de facto 12-month rule explains the test.

What early relationship evidence is most useful?

The most useful early relationship evidence is evidence that shows commitment and exclusivity rather than only contact. Examples are travel booked together, money sent to support each other, plans made together, meetings with each other's families and messages that discuss a shared future. Our guide to partner visa commitment evidence explains what case officers treat as signs of a committed relationship. Ordinary chatting across a long period shows continuity, but on its own says less about commitment.

Will the Department give early evidence less weight?

The Department may give early evidence less weight than recent evidence, because the question is whether the relationship is genuine and continuing at the time of decision. Early evidence explains the history, while recent evidence proves the relationship continues now. A balanced application includes both, so the relationship can be followed from its start to the present without gaps. Our article on how much evidence is enough explains how to balance the periods.

How should early evidence be organised?

Early evidence should be organised in date order with a short index, grouped under the four aspects the Department assesses: financial aspects, the nature of the household, social aspects and the nature of the commitment. The relationship statement should refer to the key early events so the evidence and the account line up. Consistent dates across every document matter more than volume, and screenshots should show dates clearly.

How does My Migration Lawyers use early relationship evidence?

My Migration Lawyers uses early relationship evidence to build a clear timeline that shows when the relationship became committed, which can be decisive where the 12-month de facto period is close. The firm selects the early material that proves commitment, removes material that adds nothing, and makes sure the start date stated in the application is one the evidence can support. Couples can speak with our partner visa lawyers about their evidence, or read about the Subclass 820 visa for onshore applicants.

MML
Speak To Our Lawyers

Get Clear Answers on Your Visa Options

Send us the details of your situation. One of our migration lawyers will review it and get back to you with clear advice on what you can do next and what it involves.
‍
Partner visas, protection visas, refusals and cancellations, ART review, judicial review, complex matters, corporate migration.

I came to this firm for help with my protection visa because I was very confused about the process. They listened to my situation carefully and explained what information and documents would be important. I feel much more comfortable having professional help with everything.

MML

Mariam K

Connect with our friendly team

1300 040 300
Or fill in the form & we'll call you
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
MML
About the Reviewer

Who Reviewed This Page

Weiwei Zhang is an Australian lawyer practising exclusively in Australian migration law and is the Principal Lawyer at My Migration Lawyers. She reviews the firm's published legal guidance for accuracy.
Weiwei Zhang, Principal Lawyer at My Migration Lawyers

Weiwei Zhang

Managing Director and Principal Lawyer, My Migration Lawyers
Weiwei Zhang, Principal Lawyer at My Migration Lawyers
Weiwei Zhang
Principal Lawyer
Weiwei Zhang is an Australian lawyer practising exclusively in Australian migration law and is the Principal Lawyer at My Migration Lawyers. She reviews the firm's published legal guidance for accuracy.
Last Reviewed
October 8, 2026
Question not answered here? Ask our lawyers directly.