Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Claims
LGBTI Protection Visa
There is no separate LGBTI visa. Claims based on sexual orientation, gender identity or intersex status are made under the same subclass 866 protection visa, on the ground of membership of a particular social group. The law is settled. What is difficult is proving who you are to a stranger, in a room, on the record.
Reviewed by Weiwei Zhang, Principal Lawyer Last updated 30 July 2026
Speak To Our Lawyers
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
The My Migration Lawyers Difference
Affordable fees
Competitive professional fees make experienced legal representation more accessible.
Instalment payment options
Pay professional fees in manageable instalments throughout your matter.
Experienced lawyers
Experienced representation for visa applications, refusals, cancellations and judicial reviews.
Complex matter capability
Experienced representation when complications, refusals, cancellations or judicial reviews arise.
Two-day
cooling-off period
You receive a two-business-day cooling-off period after signing the costs agreement.
In December 2003 the High Court of Australia became the first final appellate court anywhere to decide a refugee claim based on sexual orientation. In Appellant S395/2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs it held that an applicant cannot be expected to conceal their sexuality in order to avoid persecution.
That principle has been reaffirmed twice since. It removed the single largest obstacle these claims faced, and it moved the fight somewhere else.
That principle has been reaffirmed twice since. It removed the single largest obstacle these claims faced, and it moved the fight somewhere else.
Australian decision makers no longer ask whether you could live discreetly. They ask whether you are telling the truth about who you are.
Eligibility
How Do LGBTI Protection Claims Work in Australia
Short answer
Sexual orientation, gender identity and intersex status are recognised as founding membership of a particular social group, which is one of the five Refugees Convention grounds in section 36(2)(a). Where the refugee criterion is not made out, complementary protection under section 36(2)(aa) may still apply, and both should be argued.
Sexual orientation, gender identity and intersex status are recognised as founding membership of a particular social group, which is one of the five Refugees Convention grounds in section 36(2)(a). Where the refugee criterion is not made out, complementary protection under section 36(2)(aa) may still apply, and both should be argued.
The criteria sit in section 36 of the Migration Act 1958. Sexual orientation was accepted as a basis for a particular social group claim in most major refugee receiving countries by the mid 1990s, and it is not seriously contested in Australia now. The visa granted is the ordinary permanent subclass 866.
What has to be established is that you are a member of the group, that you face a well founded fear of persecution because of it, and that state protection and relocation are not reasonably available. In practice the first of those three is where most of the fighting happens.
What has to be established is that you are a member of the group, that you face a well founded fear of persecution because of it, and that state protection and relocation are not reasonably available. In practice the first of those three is where most of the fighting happens.
Eligibility at a Glance
You are in Australia and were immigration cleared on arrival
You are lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender or intersex
Membership of that group is a particular social group under the Convention
You face a well founded fear of persecution because of it
You cannot be expected to conceal your sexuality to avoid harm
State protection is not available to you
Relocation within your country is not reasonable
Complementary protection is argued in the alternative
You meet health, character and security requirements
What the High Court Decided in S395
Two gay men from Bangladesh. The Tribunal accepted they were gay, accepted that gay men faced harm in Bangladesh, and refused them anyway on the basis that they had lived discreetly and would presumably continue to do so. The High Court held that was the wrong question.
Appellant S395/2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2003) 216 CLR 473
Position
Decided
9 December 2003, High Court of Australia
The principle
The first final appellate court anywhere to decide a refugee claim based on sexual orientation
The error identified
An applicant cannot be expected to co-operate in their own protection by concealing their sexuality
Reaffirmed in
SZATV v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2007) 233 CLR 18
Reaffirmed again in
Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZSCA [2014] HCA 45
Standing
Among the most cited decisions of the High Court
Justice Kirby identified the circularity during argument. A tribunal that reasons you have no well founded fear because you have been hiding, and that you have been hiding by choice rather than from fear, has assumed its own conclusion. See Complementary Protection for the second pathway.
The law on this is settled and it is on your side. What takes work is the evidence.
Special Circumstances
Why Credibility Is Now the Battleground
Short answer
Before S395, Australian decision makers refused these claims by requiring discretion. Research on more than 300 tribunal decisions found that where discretion was required the failure rate was 98%. S395 closed that route. What happened next is that the refusals moved to a different ground: not that you could hide, but that you are not actually gay.
Before S395, Australian decision makers refused these claims by requiring discretion. Research on more than 300 tribunal decisions found that where discretion was required the failure rate was 98%. S395 closed that route. What happened next is that the refusals moved to a different ground: not that you could hide, but that you are not actually gay.
The Shift From Discretion to Disbelief
Academic analysis of Australian and Canadian decisions described the change precisely: the requirement to be discreet was replaced by a refusal to believe. That is where these cases are now decided. The delegate accepts that gay men are persecuted in the country. What they are assessing is whether this particular applicant is telling the truth about being gay.
The Evidence Problem Is Structural
The evidence a delegate instinctively looks for is exactly the evidence a person from a criminalising country will not have. No relationship recognised by anyone. No photographs. No family who knew. No friends who can swear a declaration. That absence is a consequence of the persecution, not evidence against the claim, and the application has to say so explicitly.
Living Discreetly in Australia Is Not Against You
Many applicants remain private here, from habit, from fear, or because their own community in Australia is not safe either. That is not evidence of anything. In S395 itself the tribunal that eventually found the appellants to be refugees, in 2015, did so while accepting they lived privately in Australia and would likely continue to do so in Bangladesh. The principle covers you either way.
Nothing Goes Back to Your Country
The Department does not contact your home government about your claim, does not tell your embassy you have applied, and does not seek information from the authorities you fear. Country information is drawn from published sources. Your file is protected by the Privacy Act. If you have a specific concern, raise it in writing at the outset so it sits on the file.
Everything you tell a lawyer here is covered by legal professional privilege. Nothing is lodged and nobody is contacted without your instructions.
Speak To Our Lawyers
Get Clear Answers on Your Visa Options
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
What the Visa Allows
What a Delegate Cannot Ask You to Do
Short answer
S395 and the decisions following it set limits on how these claims can be assessed. A delegate who reasons around those limits has made a reviewable error, and identifying that in the decision record is often the strongest ground on review.
S395 and the decisions following it set limits on how these claims can be assessed. A delegate who reasons around those limits has made a reviewable error, and identifying that in the decision record is often the strongest ground on review.
Expect You to Be Discreet
You cannot be required to conceal your sexuality in order to avoid persecution. That is the core holding in S395.
Split the Group in Two
Dividing a social group into discreet and non-discreet sub-categories was identified in S395 as an error of approach.
Reason in a Circle
You have no fear because you have hidden, and you hid by choice rather than fear, assumes the conclusion it is meant to prove.
Treat Private Living Here as Proof
Living privately in Australia is not evidence that you are not gay, or that you would be safe at home.
Demand Explicit Evidence
There is no requirement to produce intimate material, and no applicant should be asked to prove their sexuality that way.
Apply a Stereotype
Not fitting a decision maker's expectation of how a gay or trans person behaves is not a basis for disbelief.
The Same Rights on Grant as Any Protection Visa
If the claim succeeds you are granted the ordinary permanent subclass 866: permanent residence, full work and study rights, Medicare, a five year travel facility and a pathway to citizenship. The one caution is the same as for any protection visa. Do not travel to the country you sought protection from. See Protection Visa (866).
How Long It Stays Valid
Where a decision record contains reasoning of the kind above, that is worth identifying precisely rather than describing generally. On review, an error of approach is a far stronger position than an argument that the delegate should have weighed the evidence differently.
Refused on reasoning that looks like any of the above? That is worth having read properly.
Criminalisation
Which Countries Criminalise Same Sex Relationships
Short answer
According to ILGA World, 65 UN member states criminalise consensual same sex sexual acts as at June 2026. The death penalty is the legally prescribed penalty in seven of them, with no full legal certainty in five more. The total rose in 2025 for the first time in almost a decade.
According to ILGA World, 65 UN member states criminalise consensual same sex sexual acts as at June 2026. The death penalty is the legally prescribed penalty in seven of them, with no full legal certainty in five more. The total rose in 2025 for the first time in almost a decade.
Criminalising states
65
UN member states, ILGA World data as at June 2026.
Death penalty prescribed
7
Plus five more where there is no full legal certainty.
Application charge
$
50
The same as any protection visa. There is no separate LGBTI charge.
Subclass 866 cost breakdown
Item
Amount
Department application charge
AUD $50
Additional applicants in the same application
Nil
Health examinations
Payable, varies
Subclass 300 holder, primary
AUD $1,955
Card payment surcharge
1.4%
Health examinations
$400 to $600 per adult
Police clearances
$50 to $200 per country
NAATI translation
$30 to $80 per page
Professional fees
Quoted in writing
The low charge is deliberate. It exists so that cost is not a barrier to claiming protection. It does not mean the application is simple, and it is the one part of a protection matter that is inexpensive.
Budget separately for health examinations, and for translation of documents into English. Translation is often the largest real cost, because identity and supporting documents from many countries need accredited translation.
The Department applies a 1.4% surcharge to online card payments, which adds approximately $164 to an $11,710 charge.
Department charges are set by the Department of Home Affairs and typically increase on 1 July each year. Use the Department's visa pricing estimator or the current visa pricing table to confirm the exact charge for your circumstances.
Budget separately for health examinations, and for translation of documents into English. Translation is often the largest real cost, because identity and supporting documents from many countries need accredited translation.
The Department applies a 1.4% surcharge to online card payments, which adds approximately $164 to an $11,710 charge.
Department charges are set by the Department of Home Affairs and typically increase on 1 July each year. Use the Department's visa pricing estimator or the current visa pricing table to confirm the exact charge for your circumstances.
Get a written quote for professional fees before you commit to anything.
The Interview
The Interview on an LGBTI Claim
Short answer
There is no published processing time for the subclass 866, and the Department does not give one. Its February 2026 onshore protection update recorded 1,543 lodgements in that month, 2,264 refugee status determinations, 300 final protection visa grants, and 25,035 matters awaiting decision at the end of the period.
There is no published processing time for the subclass 866, and the Department does not give one. Its February 2026 onshore protection update recorded 1,543 lodgements in that month, 2,264 refugee status determinations, 300 final protection visa grants, and 25,035 matters awaiting decision at the end of the period.
What the interview usually covers on an LGBTI claim
Area
What is asked about
Realisation and self understanding
When you knew, and how you understood it at the time
Relationships
Any relationships, how they began, and how they were kept private
Community and connection
Involvement with any group or community, here or at home
Who knows and what happened
Disclosure to family or others, and the consequences of it
Life in Australia
How you live here, and whether you are open with anyone
The risk on return
What you believe would happen, from whom, and whether police would act
Those figures give context rather than a forecast. They show a large volume of matters awaiting decision and a much smaller number of final grants in any given month. Newer applications are reportedly being decided considerably faster than older ones, but no published figure applies evenly to every case.
What affects timing most is identity. Where documents are complete, translated and consistent, matters move. Where identity is contested or documents are unavailable, security and identity checks can add many months regardless of how strong the protection claim itself is.
You generally hold a bridging visa throughout, so the wait is uncomfortable rather than unlawful, provided the application was lodged while you still held a substantive visa.
What affects timing most is identity. Where documents are complete, translated and consistent, matters move. Where identity is contested or documents are unavailable, security and identity checks can add many months regardless of how strong the protection claim itself is.
You generally hold a bridging visa throughout, so the wait is uncomfortable rather than unlawful, provided the application was lodged while you still held a substantive visa.
The interview is where these claims are decided. Preparation is the difference and it takes more than a few days.
Who We Act For
Where LGBTI Protection Claims Commonly Arise
Short answer
Claims arise from countries that criminalise same sex acts, and from countries that do not but where family, community or police will not protect you. Nationality does not establish a claim and it never has. Every application is assessed on what that person personally faces on return.Complementary protection claims arise wherever serious harm occurs for reasons unconnected to the Refugees Convention. Nationality does not establish a claim and it never has. Every application is assessed on what happened to that person and what they personally face on return.
Most of the people we act for arrived lawfully on a student, visitor, working holiday or skilled visa. For many, the reason they cannot return is something they had never told anyone, in any country, before the first consultation.
Claims arise from countries that criminalise same sex acts, and from countries that do not but where family, community or police will not protect you. Nationality does not establish a claim and it never has. Every application is assessed on what that person personally faces on return.Complementary protection claims arise wherever serious harm occurs for reasons unconnected to the Refugees Convention. Nationality does not establish a claim and it never has. Every application is assessed on what happened to that person and what they personally face on return.
Most of the people we act for arrived lawfully on a student, visitor, working holiday or skilled visa. For many, the reason they cannot return is something they had never told anyone, in any country, before the first consultation.
Bangladesh
Cambodia
China
Colombia
Egypt
Fiji
India
Indonesia
Iran
Lebanon
Malaysia
Myanmar
Nepal
Pakistan
Russia
Singapore
Sri Lanka
Vietnam
Not listed? It makes no difference. Nationality is not a criterion, and there is no country list that qualifies or disqualifies a claim.
Decriminalisation on paper is not safety in fact. Both situations can found a claim.
Evidence
How Do You Prove an LGBTI Protection Claim
Short answer
This is the hard part and it needs saying plainly. There is no document that proves sexual orientation, and no delegate expects one. What carries the claim is a detailed personal narrative about realisation and disclosure, whatever corroboration happens to exist, and an explicit explanation of why the usual evidence does not.
This is the hard part and it needs saying plainly. There is no document that proves sexual orientation, and no delegate expects one. What carries the claim is a detailed personal narrative about realisation and disclosure, whatever corroboration happens to exist, and an explicit explanation of why the usual evidence does not.
Your Own Application File
The centre of the claim. When you first understood, what that felt like, what you did about it, who you told and what happened. Delegates are assessing whether this reads as a life someone actually lived, and detail about internal experience carries more weight than any document.
Whatever Corroboration Exists
Messages with partners, dating application records, photographs, statements from a partner or a friend who knows, membership of a community organisation in Australia, counselling or medical records, and evidence of any incident that occurred. Some applicants have a great deal. Many have almost nothing.
Explaining What Does Not Exist
The absence of evidence is itself explainable and the explanation belongs in the application. Photographs were deleted because a phone could be searched. Messages were destroyed. Nobody was told because disclosure meant danger. State that directly rather than leaving a delegate to draw their own conclusion from a gap.
Country Information
What the law says, and what actually happens. Enforcement, police conduct, family and community violence, and whether protection exists in practice. Where the law has been repealed but violence continues, that gap is the whole case and it has to be evidenced.
Documents Commonly Required
A detailed personal narrative covering realisation, relationships and disclosure
A written explanation of why the usual evidence does not exist
Messages, photographs or dating application records where they exist
A statement from a partner, former partner or anyone who knows
Membership or attendance records for an LGBTI organisation in Australia
Counselling, psychological or medical records where relevant
Evidence of any incident: police report, medical record, threat, eviction
Country information on the law, and on what happens in practice
Country information on family and community violence, and on police response
Passport, national identity documents and evidence of nationality
Accredited English translations of every document not in English
A submission arguing complementary protection in the alternative
Absent evidence needs explaining, not hiding. That explanation belongs in the application.
Refusals
Why Are LGBTI Protection Claims Refused
Short answer
Almost always because the delegate is not satisfied the applicant is who they say they are. Rarely because the country is found to be safe. The reasoning tends to appear in a small number of recognisable forms, and several of them are legally vulnerable on review.
Almost always because the delegate is not satisfied the applicant is who they say they are. Rarely because the country is found to be safe. The reasoning tends to appear in a small number of recognisable forms, and several of them are legally vulnerable on review.
Common Refusal Grounds
A finding that the applicant is not in fact gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender or intersex
A narrative treated as too general, with no detail about internal experience
An absence of corroborating evidence, where the absence was never explained
Delay in disclosing the claim, particularly where an earlier visa application said something different
Reasoning that the applicant lived discreetly and could continue to, which S395 prohibits
A previous marriage or children treated as inconsistent with the claim
An expectation that the applicant would fit a stereotype of behaviour or appearance
A finding that relocation within the country is reasonable
A finding that the law is no longer enforced, without regard to non-state violence
Complementary protection never argued in the alternative
If Your Claim Has Been Refused
Review rights generally apply to the Administrative Review Tribunal, which reconsiders the claim afresh and holds its own hearing. Where the refusal reasoning discloses an error of approach of the kind S395 identified, that is a materially stronger position than arguing the evidence should have been weighed differently. Time limits are strict. See Protection Visa Refusal.
Speak To Our Lawyers
Get Clear Answers Before You Lodge
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
The Process
How to Make an LGBTI Protection Claim
Short answer
This is the hard part and it needs saying plainly. There is no document that proves sexual orientation, and no delegate expects one. What carries the claim is a detailed personal narrative about realisation and disclosure, whatever corroboration happens to exist, and an explicit explanation of why the usual evidence does not.
This is the hard part and it needs saying plainly. There is no document that proves sexual orientation, and no delegate expects one. What carries the claim is a detailed personal narrative about realisation and disclosure, whatever corroboration happens to exist, and an explicit explanation of why the usual evidence does not.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
01
Get Advice Before You Lodge
Section 48A generally bars a second protection application after a refusal. The first application is effectively the only one, and on these claims the framing matters as much as the facts.
02
Lodge While Your Current Visa Is Valid
This determines which bridging visa you get and whether you keep work rights. It is the most consequential timing decision in the process.
03
Build the Personal Narrative First
Realisation, relationships, disclosure, consequences, and what you fear. Detail about internal experience is what carries these claims, not documents.
04
Gather Whatever Corroboration Exists
Messages, photographs, statements from anyone who knows, community involvement in Australia, counselling records, evidence of any incident.
05
Explain What Does Not Exist
Deleted photographs, destroyed messages, nobody told. Say why directly rather than leaving a delegate to draw conclusions from a silence.
06
Deal With Anything That Looks Inconsistent
A previous marriage, children, an earlier visa application that said something different, a delay in disclosing. Address each one before the delegate raises it.
07
Argue Complementary Protection in the Alternative
Where the particular social group argument is not accepted, section 36(2)(aa) may still be. Both should be pleaded rather than one.
08
Prepare for the Interview
You will be asked about your sexuality in detail by a stranger, on the record. Preparation is what makes that survivable and accurate.
There is no separate LGBTI application and no separate charge. See Protection Visa (866) for the application itself and The Protection Visa Interview for what happens next.
You generally get one protection application. On these claims the framing matters as much as the facts.
Trans and Intersex
Transgender and Intersex Claims
Short answer
Gender identity and intersex status found particular social group claims on the same basis as sexual orientation. The legal position is the same. The practical problems are different, and applications that treat them as identical tend to miss the strongest part of the claim.
Documents are the recurring issue. Identity documents in a former name or gender marker, a home country that refuses to amend them, and a delegate who reads the discrepancy as an identity concern. Provide the documents you have, plus evidence of any change, and explain the position rather than leaving it to be discovered.
Trans applicants are frequently at risk from family, community and police simultaneously, and often cannot access healthcare, employment or housing at home. That combination can found a claim on both the refugee criterion and complementary protection, and both should be argued.
You are entitled to be addressed by the name and pronouns you use. We use them in the file, in correspondence and in the application, and we raise it in advance so the interview does not begin with a correction. See The Protection Visa Interview.
Gender identity and intersex status found particular social group claims on the same basis as sexual orientation. The legal position is the same. The practical problems are different, and applications that treat them as identical tend to miss the strongest part of the claim.
Documents are the recurring issue. Identity documents in a former name or gender marker, a home country that refuses to amend them, and a delegate who reads the discrepancy as an identity concern. Provide the documents you have, plus evidence of any change, and explain the position rather than leaving it to be discovered.
Trans applicants are frequently at risk from family, community and police simultaneously, and often cannot access healthcare, employment or housing at home. That combination can found a claim on both the refugee criterion and complementary protection, and both should be argued.
You are entitled to be addressed by the name and pronouns you use. We use them in the file, in correspondence and in the application, and we raise it in advance so the interview does not begin with a correction. See The Protection Visa Interview.
Documents in a former name or gender? That needs addressing in the application, not at the interview.
How We Help
How My Migration Lawyers Assists With LGBTI Protection Claims
Short Answer
We build the narrative with you over more than one session, explain the evidence that does not exist, deal with the things that look inconsistent before a delegate raises them, prepare you for questions you have never been asked before, and attend the interview so you are not answering them alone.
We build the narrative with you over more than one session, explain the evidence that does not exist, deal with the things that look inconsistent before a delegate raises them, prepare you for questions you have never been asked before, and attend the interview so you are not answering them alone.
1
A First Conversation Without Pressure
For many applicants the consultation is the first time they have said any of this to anyone in authority. Nothing is lodged, nobody is contacted, and everything is covered by legal professional privilege.
2
Building the Personal Narrative
Realisation, relationships, disclosure and consequences, in your own words. Detail about internal experience is what carries these claims, and it takes more than one session to draw out properly.
3
Identifying What Corroboration Exists
Messages, photographs, dating application records, statements from anyone who knows, community involvement in Australia, counselling records. Most applicants have more than they think and less than a delegate expects.
4
Explaining What Does Not Exist
Deleted photographs, destroyed messages, nobody told. We put the explanation in the application rather than leaving a delegate to draw conclusions from a silence.
5
Dealing With What Looks Inconsistent
A previous marriage, children, an earlier visa application that said something different, years of delay before disclosing. Each is explainable and each has to be addressed before the delegate raises it.
6
Arguing Complementary Protection in the Alternative
Where the particular social group argument is not accepted, section 36(2)(aa) may still be. Both are pleaded rather than one.
7
Country Information on Law and Practice
What the statute says, whether it is enforced, and what families, communities and police actually do. Where a law has been repealed but violence continues, that gap is the case.
8
Name and Pronouns
We use the name and pronouns you give us in the file, in correspondence and in the application, and we notify the Department in advance so the interview does not begin with a correction.
9
Documents in a Former Name or Gender
Where identity documents cannot be amended at home, we address the discrepancy in the application rather than leaving it to surface as an identity concern.
10
Interpreter Arrangements
Interpreters come from communities, sometimes your own. Where that is a concern we raise it with the Department before the interview rather than on the day.
11
Interview Preparation
You will be asked about your sexuality in detail by a stranger, on the record. We take you through the areas that will be covered so the first time you say it aloud is not at the interview.
12
Attending the Interview With You
We attend, and if a question is inappropriate or an interpreting problem arises, we raise it at the time rather than after the decision.
13
Identifying Errors of Approach in a Refusal
Reasoning that expects discretion, splits the group, applies a stereotype or treats private living in Australia as proof is legally vulnerable. On review that is a far stronger position than a disagreement about weight.
14
Running the Tribunal Review
The Tribunal reconsiders the claim afresh and holds its own hearing, so an adverse credibility finding by a delegate does not bind it. We assess the merits and lodge within the time limit.
What Working With Us Looks Like
Lawyers, not agents
Your matter is handled by Australian lawyers, and what you tell us is covered by legal professional privilege.
Nothing is reported
We do not report to the Department, and nothing you tell us reaches your family, your community or your home country.
Fees quoted in writing
You know the professional fee before you engage us. The Department charge of $50 is paid by you directly.
One firm from start to finish
The same team runs the assessment, the statement, the lodgement, the interview and any review. Nothing is handed off midway.
The first conversation costs you nothing and commits you to nothing. Tell us your situation before anything is lodged.
After the Grant
What Happens if the Claim Succeeds
Short answer
You are granted the ordinary permanent subclass 866, the same visa as any other successful protection applicant. Permanent residence from the day of grant, full work and study rights, Medicare, government support, a five year travel facility and a pathway to citizenship. There is no lesser status for an LGBTI claim.
The visa carries a five year travel facility from grant, after which a Resident Return visa is needed. It does not extend to the country you sought protection from, and returning there can put the visa at risk. Australia also recognises same sex marriage and de facto relationships, so if you form a relationship here the partner visa pathways are open to your partner in the ordinary way. See Same Sex and LGBTIQ+ Partner Visa.
You are granted the ordinary permanent subclass 866, the same visa as any other successful protection applicant. Permanent residence from the day of grant, full work and study rights, Medicare, government support, a five year travel facility and a pathway to citizenship. There is no lesser status for an LGBTI claim.
The visa carries a five year travel facility from grant, after which a Resident Return visa is needed. It does not extend to the country you sought protection from, and returning there can put the visa at risk. Australia also recognises same sex marriage and de facto relationships, so if you form a relationship here the partner visa pathways are open to your partner in the ordinary way. See Same Sex and LGBTIQ+ Partner Visa.
Permanent from day one, and a country where the relationship is lawful and legally protected.
Questions
LGBTI Protection Visa Frequently Asked Questions
Answers to the questions Indonesians applicants ask most often. See also our 30 protection visa FAQs and 30 LGBT protection visa FAQs.
Can I Get a Protection Visa Because I Am Gay
Yes, where you face a well founded fear of persecution because of it. Sexual orientation founds a claim on the ground of membership of a particular social group. There is no separate LGBTI visa. The application is the ordinary subclass 866.
Can I Be Told to Live Discreetly to Avoid Persecution
No. In Appellant S395/2002 the High Court held that an applicant cannot be expected to conceal their sexuality in order to avoid persecution. That principle has been reaffirmed twice since. A decision reasoning that way discloses an error of approach.
How Do I Prove I Am Gay
There is no document that proves sexual orientation and no delegate expects one. What carries the claim is a detailed personal narrative about realisation, relationships and disclosure, whatever corroboration exists, and an explicit explanation of why the usual evidence does not.
What if I Have No Evidence Because It Was Not Safe
That is the position most applicants are in and it is explainable. Photographs deleted because a phone could be searched, messages destroyed, nobody told because disclosure meant danger. Say that in the application rather than leaving a delegate to draw conclusions from a silence.
Does It Matter That I Was Married or Have Children
No, and it is common. Many applicants married under family or social pressure, or before they understood their own position, or precisely to conceal it. It needs addressing in the application rather than left for a delegate to raise as an apparent inconsistency.
Will My Family or My Community Be Told
No. The Department does not contact your home government, your embassy, your family or your community. Your file is protected by the Privacy Act. Everything you tell a lawyer here is covered by legal professional privilege.
Does My Country Have to Criminalise Same Sex Relationships
No. Criminalisation strengthens a claim but its absence does not end one. Countries where same sex acts are lawful can still be places where people are killed by families, driven out by communities, or left unprotected by police who will not act.
How Many Countries Criminalise Same Sex Relationships
According to ILGA World, 65 UN member states criminalise consensual same sex sexual acts as at June 2026. The death penalty is the legally prescribed penalty in seven, with no full legal certainty in five more. The total rose in 2025 for the first time in almost a decade.
Does the Same Apply to Transgender and Intersex Applicants
Yes. Gender identity and intersex status found particular social group claims on the same basis as sexual orientation. The practical issues differ, particularly identity documents in a former name or gender marker that a home country will not amend.
What if I Live Privately in Australia Too
It is not evidence against you. Many applicants remain private here from habit, from fear, or because their own community in Australia is not safe. In S395 itself the appellants were eventually found to be refugees while living privately in Australia.
What if I Only Disclosed This Years After Arriving
Delay is asked about in almost every interview and it is almost always explainable. Not knowing protection existed, holding a valid visa at the time, fear of the consequences, or not being ready to say it aloud are all legitimate. Unexplained delay is what causes damage.
What Happens if the Claim Succeeds
You are granted the ordinary permanent subclass 866: permanent residence, full work and study rights, Medicare, government support, a five year travel facility and a pathway to citizenship. There is no lesser status for an LGBTI claim.
About the Reviewer
Who Reviewed This Page
Weiwei Zhang is an Australian lawyer practising exclusively in Australian migration law and is the Principal Lawyer at My Migration Lawyers. She reviews the firm's published legal guidance for accuracy.
Weiwei Zhang
Managing Director and Principal Lawyer, My Migration Lawyers
Weiwei Zhang
Principal Lawyer
Weiwei Zhang is an Australian lawyer practising exclusively in Australian migration law and is the Principal Lawyer at My Migration Lawyers. She reviews the firm's published legal guidance for accuracy.
Last Reviewed
16 September 2026
Question not answered here? Ask our lawyers directly.