Is an Onshore Partner Visa Faster Than an Offshore Partner Visa?

Whether an onshore partner visa is faster than an offshore partner visa cannot be answered by a rule, because the Department publishes separate processing times for the Subclass 820 and the Subclass 309 and both change regularly. The pathway should be chosen on eligibility, visa status and risk, not on an expected speed difference.
Deciding between applying in Australia or from overseas? Tell us where the applicant is now, which visa they hold and how long you have been together.

Key points

  • The onshore pathway is the Subclass 820/801 and the offshore pathway is the Subclass 309/100.
  • The Subclass 820 applicant must be in Australia at lodgement and at grant.
  • The Subclass 309 is generally granted while the applicant is outside Australia.
  • Onshore applicants without a substantive visa must generally meet Schedule 3 criteria.

Does the Department process onshore partner visas faster than offshore ones?

The Department does not process onshore partner visas faster than offshore ones as a rule. It publishes a separate processing time for the Subclass 820 and the Subclass 309, and at different times either figure may be shorter. A published figure also says nothing certain about an individual case, which depends on the evidence and any issues the application raises. Our article on partner visa processing times explains how to read the Department's published figures.

What actually decides how long each pathway takes?

What actually decides how long each pathway takes is the completeness of the application, the applicant's history and the need for the Department to verify documents or make enquiries. Offshore cases often rely on overseas civil documents and police certificates that take time to obtain. Onshore cases may raise questions about the applicant's visa history in Australia. Our article on partner visa processing delays explains the common causes on both pathways.

What does the applicant gain by applying onshore?

An applicant who applies onshore can usually stay in Australia with their partner while the application is processed, on a bridging visa that comes into effect when the current substantive visa ends. This is often the strongest reason couples prefer the Subclass 820, because the couple are not separated during processing. Our page on the Subclass 820 visa and our guide to the onshore partner visa explain the onshore requirements.

When is the offshore pathway the safer choice?

The offshore pathway is often the safer choice where the applicant cannot meet the onshore requirements. Examples include an applicant whose visa carries condition 8503 without a waiver, an applicant without a substantive visa who may not meet Schedule 3, or an applicant affected by an earlier refusal. The Subclass 309 avoids those onshore barriers, although the applicant must generally be outside Australia when it is granted. Our page on the Subclass 309 visa and our guide to the offshore partner visa explain the offshore process.

Should we change pathway to get a faster decision?

A couple should not change pathway only in the hope of a faster decision, because withdrawing and lodging again means a new charge, a new lodgement date and possibly new requirements. Moving between pathways can also create problems with bridging visas and location rules. Where a change is genuinely needed, it should be planned carefully. Our article on partner visa Australia: which pathway compares the options.

How does My Migration Lawyers choose between the onshore and offshore pathway for a couple?

My Migration Lawyers chooses the pathway by testing the applicant's current visa, visa conditions, immigration history and travel plans against the onshore and offshore criteria, then weighing the practical effect on the couple during processing. The firm explains which pathway carries less legal risk and what each means for work, travel and time apart, so the couple make the decision with full information. Couples weighing the two options can speak with our partner visa lawyers before anything is lodged.

MML
Speak To Our Lawyers

Get Clear Answers on Your Visa Options

Send us the details of your situation. One of our migration lawyers will review it and get back to you with clear advice on what you can do next and what it involves.
‍
Partner visas, protection visas, refusals and cancellations, ART review, judicial review, complex matters, corporate migration.

I came to this firm for help with my protection visa because I was very confused about the process. They listened to my situation carefully and explained what information and documents would be important. I feel much more comfortable having professional help with everything.

MML

Mariam K

Connect with our friendly team

1300 040 300
Or fill in the form & we'll call you
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
MML
About the Reviewer

Who Reviewed This Page

Weiwei Zhang is an Australian lawyer practising exclusively in Australian migration law and is the Principal Lawyer at My Migration Lawyers. She reviews the firm's published legal guidance for accuracy.
Weiwei Zhang, Principal Lawyer at My Migration Lawyers

Weiwei Zhang

Managing Director and Principal Lawyer, My Migration Lawyers
Weiwei Zhang, Principal Lawyer at My Migration Lawyers
Weiwei Zhang
Principal Lawyer
Weiwei Zhang is an Australian lawyer practising exclusively in Australian migration law and is the Principal Lawyer at My Migration Lawyers. She reviews the firm's published legal guidance for accuracy.
Last Reviewed
October 8, 2026
Question not answered here? Ask our lawyers directly.