Can I Send More Than the Section 56 Request Asks For?

An applicant can send more than a section 56 request asks for, because the Department must consider any relevant information given before it decides. Extra material should still be selective. It should answer the request first, then add only evidence that strengthens a criterion the case officer is likely to examine, without creating new inconsistencies.
Wondering whether to send extra documents with your response? Tell us what the request asks for and what else you are thinking of including.

Key points

  • Section 56 of the Migration Act allows the Department to request further information about an application.
  • Section 55 allows an applicant to give further relevant information at any time before the decision.
  • Documents not in English must be accompanied by an English translation.
  • The four assessed aspects of a partner relationship are financial aspects, the nature of the household, social aspects and the nature of the commitment.

Is it allowed to send more than a section 56 request asks for?

Sending more than a section 56 request asks for is allowed, because section 55 of the Migration Act lets an applicant give further relevant information at any time until the decision is made, and the Department must have regard to it. A section 56 request does not limit what the applicant may provide. It only identifies what the case officer needs at a minimum. Our guide on how to respond to a section 56 request explains the request itself.

When does extra evidence help a section 56 response?

Extra evidence helps a section 56 response when it fills a gap the request points towards but does not name. A request for proof of a shared address, for example, often signals doubt about the nature of the household, so recent joint bills and correspondence can usefully accompany the lease. Updated evidence for each of the four assessed aspects of the relationship is also valuable where the application was lodged long ago.

When can sending too much hurt a partner visa?

Sending too much can hurt a partner visa when the extra material is unfocused, repeats what is already on file or contains details that conflict with earlier statements. A case officer working through hundreds of pages may miss the documents that actually answer the request. Inconsistent dates or addresses in new material can also raise fresh concerns. Our article on how much evidence is enough for a partner visa explains why quality matters more than volume.

How should a section 56 response with extra documents be organised?

A section 56 response with extra documents should be organised so the requested items come first and are clearly labelled against each point in the request. Additional evidence should follow under its own heading with a short explanation of why it is relevant. Every document not in English needs a translation, as explained in our article on partner visa evidence translation. A covering letter that maps each document to the request makes the case officer's task easy.

Should I update my relationship evidence when I reply?

Updating relationship evidence when replying is usually sensible, because the Department decides whether the relationship is genuine and continuing at the time of decision. Recent financial records, photographs with context and evidence of shared plans show that the relationship has continued since lodgement. Our article on partner visa relationship evidence explains what carries weight.

How does My Migration Lawyers decide what to add to a section 56 response?

My Migration Lawyers decides what to add to a section 56 response by reading the request against the whole file and asking what concern lies behind it. The firm then answers the request in full, adds only the further evidence that addresses that concern, and checks every new document for consistency with the original application and earlier visa history. The result is a response a case officer can assess quickly. Couples preparing a reply can ask our partner visa lawyers to review it before it is lodged.

MML
Speak To Our Lawyers

Get Clear Answers on Your Visa Options

Send us the details of your situation. One of our migration lawyers will review it and get back to you with clear advice on what you can do next and what it involves.
‍
Partner visas, protection visas, refusals and cancellations, ART review, judicial review, complex matters, corporate migration.

I came to this firm for help with my protection visa because I was very confused about the process. They listened to my situation carefully and explained what information and documents would be important. I feel much more comfortable having professional help with everything.

MML

Mariam K

Connect with our friendly team

1300 040 300
Or fill in the form & we'll call you
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
MML
About the Reviewer

Who Reviewed This Page

Weiwei Zhang is an Australian lawyer practising exclusively in Australian migration law and is the Principal Lawyer at My Migration Lawyers. She reviews the firm's published legal guidance for accuracy.
Weiwei Zhang, Principal Lawyer at My Migration Lawyers

Weiwei Zhang

Managing Director and Principal Lawyer, My Migration Lawyers
Weiwei Zhang, Principal Lawyer at My Migration Lawyers
Weiwei Zhang
Principal Lawyer
Weiwei Zhang is an Australian lawyer practising exclusively in Australian migration law and is the Principal Lawyer at My Migration Lawyers. She reviews the firm's published legal guidance for accuracy.
Last Reviewed
October 8, 2026
Question not answered here? Ask our lawyers directly.