Why Was Our Relationship Questioned Despite Strong Evidence?

A relationship can be questioned despite strong evidence because the Department tests consistency and credibility, not only the volume of documents. Differences between statements, earlier visa applications that did not declare the partner, information from third parties or evidence created just before lodgement can all raise doubts that more photographs or bank statements will not answer.
Has the Department questioned your relationship even though you sent plenty of evidence? Tell us what the letter says and the date you must respond by.

Key points

  • The Department may request further information under section 56 of the Migration Act.
  • Under section 57, the Department must invite comment on adverse information about the applicant or another person that would be the reason, or part of the reason, for refusal.
  • Married and de facto relationships must be genuine and continuing under sections 5F and 5CB of the Migration Act.
  • Response deadlines are short and strictly applied.

Why does strong evidence not always satisfy the Department?

Strong evidence does not always satisfy the Department because a case officer weighs the whole application, and one serious inconsistency can outweigh a large volume of documents. The Department asks whether the relationship is genuine and continuing, and a doubt about credibility affects how every other document is read. Our article on how much evidence a partner visa needs explains why quality and consistency matter more than quantity.

What inconsistencies commonly cause the Department to question a relationship?

The inconsistencies that commonly cause the Department to question a relationship are differences in dates, addresses and events between the partners' statements, Form 888 statements, interview answers and documents. A meeting date that differs between two accounts, or a lease that shows a different address, can be enough. Our article on conflicting statements explains how these differences arise and how they can be explained.

Can earlier visa applications cause doubts about our relationship?

Earlier visa applications can cause doubts about a relationship when they contain information that does not match the partner visa. A visitor or student visa application that described the applicant as single, or did not mention the partner, may be read as evidence that the relationship began later than claimed. Our article on an undeclared relationship explains how the Department treats this issue and how a response can address it honestly.

Can information from other people affect how our relationship is assessed?

Information from other people can affect how a relationship is assessed, including information from former partners, family members or anonymous tip-offs. Where that information would be the reason, or part of the reason, for refusal, section 57 requires the Department to put it to the applicant for comment. Our article on section 57 adverse information gives common examples of information the Department relies on. The applicant can then correct, explain or rebut the information before the Department makes its decision.

What happens after the Department questions our relationship?

After the Department questions a relationship, it usually sends a request for further information or a natural justice letter inviting comment within a short deadline. The response is often the most important document in the application, because it is the couple's chance to deal with the concern directly before a decision. Our articles on the section 56 request and the section 57 natural justice letter explain how to respond.

What if the partner visa is refused as not genuine?

If a partner visa is refused because the Department is not satisfied the relationship is genuine, review may be available at the Administrative Review Tribunal within a strict time limit. The Tribunal considers the case afresh and can take new evidence. Our article on a non-genuine relationship refusal explains the reasons the Department commonly gives.

How does My Migration Lawyers respond when the Department doubts a relationship?

My Migration Lawyers responds when the Department doubts a relationship by first identifying the precise concern, which is often narrower than the couple fear, and then gathering the evidence and explanations that answer that concern directly. The firm reviews the full file, including earlier visa applications, so the response does not create new inconsistencies. Couples facing doubts, or a refusal, can speak with our partner visa refusal team before their deadline passes.

MML
Speak To Our Lawyers

Get Clear Answers on Your Visa Options

Send us the details of your situation. One of our migration lawyers will review it and get back to you with clear advice on what you can do next and what it involves.
‍
Partner visas, protection visas, refusals and cancellations, ART review, judicial review, complex matters, corporate migration.

I came to this firm for help with my protection visa because I was very confused about the process. They listened to my situation carefully and explained what information and documents would be important. I feel much more comfortable having professional help with everything.

MML

Mariam K

Connect with our friendly team

1300 040 300
Or fill in the form & we'll call you
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
MML
About the Reviewer

Who Reviewed This Page

Weiwei Zhang is an Australian lawyer practising exclusively in Australian migration law and is the Principal Lawyer at My Migration Lawyers. She reviews the firm's published legal guidance for accuracy.
Weiwei Zhang, Principal Lawyer at My Migration Lawyers

Weiwei Zhang

Managing Director and Principal Lawyer, My Migration Lawyers
Weiwei Zhang, Principal Lawyer at My Migration Lawyers
Weiwei Zhang
Principal Lawyer
Weiwei Zhang is an Australian lawyer practising exclusively in Australian migration law and is the Principal Lawyer at My Migration Lawyers. She reviews the firm's published legal guidance for accuracy.
Last Reviewed
October 8, 2026
Question not answered here? Ask our lawyers directly.